Bailout Investigation - That Didn’t Take Long. »
By 186 on Oct 31, 2008 in Constitution, Politics, congress, crime, democrats, economy | 0 Comments
The ink is barely dry on the bailout funny money the banks received and we have our 1st hearings on the money being misused.
Congress sets hearing on banks’ use of bailout money - Openers - cleveland.com
WASHINGTON — The House Financial Services Committee will conduct hearings on whether banks are misusing federal bailout money on November 12 and 18, Bainbridge Township GOP Rep. Steven LaTourette announced Thursday.
Gee….who would of thought the money would be “misused”? I’m SHOCKED!
Congressman Steven C. LaTourette Serving Ohio’s 14th District - News Room
U.S. Rep. Steven C. LaTourette (R-OH) today announced that the House Committee on Financial Services will hold hearings on November 12th and November 18th into the potential misuse of bailout funds, including the purchase of National City Bank in Cleveland.LaTourette, a senior member of the panel, spoke to Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) on Monday and urged an investigation after it was revealed that $7.7 billion in federal bailout money was used to help Pittsburgh-based PNC buy National City at a fire sale price. National City had been denied bailout money.
“The government should not be able to use taxpayer money to destroy banks, irreparably damage shareholders and cause the loss of thousands of jobs,” LaTourette said.
House Financial Services Committee
“I am deeply disappointed that a number of financial institutions are distorting the legislation that Congress passed at the President’s request to respond to the credit crisis by making funds available for increased lending. Any use of the these funds for any purpose other than lending—for bonuses, for severance pay, for dividends, for acquisitions of other institutions, etc.– is a violation of the terms of the Act.
Bailout funds being spent in ways Congress never foresaw
“I could say I told you so,” said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, who helped lead a revolt against GOP leaders and sunk the $700 billion plan on its first pass. “It was so open-ended and we put so little accountability into it, they can basically do whatever they want to with the money.”




