Bill Ayers, Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden donate to Obama campaign !

This is a ticking time bomb for Barack Obama.
BarackObama.com’s Lax Security Opens Door to Online Donor Fraud | The Next Right
I just contributed $5 to Barack Obama.
I didn’t want to. Ideally, I could have contributed $0.01 and cost them money. But it was the only way to confirm the root cause of the fraudulent micro-donations to the Obama campaign (”Doodad Pro” for $17,300 and “Good Will” for $11,000).
The Obama campaign has turned its security settings for accepting online contributions down to the bare minimum — possibly to juice the numbers, and turning a blind eye towards the potential for fraud not just against the FEC, but against unsuspecting victims of credit card fraud.
Right Truth: Barack Obama Associations
There is more concern about Obama’s lack of compliance with the law because of its acceptance of prohibited donations from foreign nationals, excessive contributions from individuals, and donations from unknown sources. It does look suspicious when contributors names are: Family Guy, O.J. Simpson, Osama bin Laden, and King Kong.
National Journal Online - FEC Rules Leave Loopholes For Online Donation Data
Barack Obama’s campaign has collected tens of millions of dollars from suspect overseas donors. Their complaints spurred the Republican National Committee on Oct. 6 to ask the Federal Election Commission for an investigation of the Obama donations.
To test the campaigns’ practices, this author bought two pre-paid American Express gift cards worth $25 each to donate to the Obama and McCain campaigns online. As required by law, the campaigns’ Web sites asked for, and National Journal provided, the donor’s correct name, location and employment. The cards were purchased with cash at a Washington, D.C., drugstore, and the campaigns’ Web sites were accessed through a public computer at a library in Fairfax County, Virginia.
The Obama campaign’s Web site accepted the $25 donation, but the McCain campaign’s Web site rejected it.
Atlas Shrugs: UPDATE: RNC FILES SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT TO FEC
There is enormous amount of money being secreted into the Obama campaign from foreign sources. It is fairly safe to say these countries will be richly rewarded - Kenya, Indonesia but most of all - Obama will drop a load on the UN. Fosho.
The crooked, corrupt international one world global warmers have the largest stake in this election.
Atlas Shrugs:
This simply should not, and could not, happen in any business or any campaign that is honestly trying to vet it’s donors. Also, I don’t see how this could possibly happen without the collusion of the credit card companies. They simply wouldn’t allow any business to process, potentially, hundreds of millions in credit card transactions where the name on the card doesn’t match the purchasers name.
The Corner on National Review Online
Re: Who is John Galt? And Saddam Hussein? [Mark Steyn]
Kathryn, the reader who discovered that the Obama campaign accepts fraudulent donations also emailed me (unfortunately, while New Hampshire’s Third World Internet service was down again). I was interested in the subject because I also have an online credit-card operation over at my website (obviously a little smaller than Senator Obama’s), and so I looked into what our CC processing requires. In order to accept financial donations from “John Galt” and “Saddam Hussein”, whoever runs the Obama website would have to modify the default security checks required by their merchant processor.
Power Line - Who is John Galt?
We’ve previously noted the gusher of illegal campaign contributions flowing into the Obama campaign from contributors such as “Doodad Pro” and “Good Will.” More recently, incidents have been reported in which people have seen credit card charges surface suggesting they donated to Barack Obama when they did not. Matthew Mosk and Sarah Cohen noted one such incident earlier this week:
RedState: Voter fraud, now credit card fraud…
So, gentle reader, we not only have a Democrat trying to buy the election of a President - after he made great press about using only public money in order to avoid the appearance of evil - we have the spectacle of that candidate using credit card fraud to do it.
Let’s be real clear about this. The security protocols have to be manually disabled. It’s not really easy to do and requires the absolute intent to do it. It can’t be done “by mistake”.
National Journal Picks Up Story, Weakly
I see no pressing questions for Barack Obama, demanding to know what possible reason they might have to deliberately cripple the most basic form of credit card security.
I cannot stress enough: AVS is default. It is not an arcane option you can choose. It is the default. To turn it off requires deliberate, intentional action.
And Barack Obama cannot offer any plausible legitimate reason for doing so.
Why does Barack Obama has less security on his credit card donations than my local cheesesteak shop?
obama, credit cards, credit, online, fraud, donations